Skip to main content

Organic, or 'internal' growth.

 

Organic, or ‘internal’ growth comes from within a business and should be mentioned alongside economies of scale (which are different) when you are discussing the way in which businesses can grow. Economies of scale allow one to reduce long run average cost to the minimum point and keep it there across a range of output because of the size of the business. Organic growth is one way you get that increase in size.

A business can grow organically in a number of ways. It can expand its product range for instance, or enter new markets, or take on new shops and geographical areas. In doing this it runs the risk of getting too big too quickly, and suffering from diseconomies of scale, from rising AC and lower AR. Increasing productivity would allow a business to increase output by using technology better, or getting more out of its workers, leading to more output and sales value for the same or less factor cost.

As you can see from this link, organic growth might be preferable to taking over existing businesses, and can be financed by retained profits. This is true for Ltd or plc companies. Often, however, businesses combine the effort to retain profit and to put the retained amount into the business with loans based on projections of future growth. This can go wrong—look at Tesco in America, for instance.

https://www.tutor2u.net/business/reference/organic-internal-growth

To hedge against the risks of internal growth, many businesses, especially in the food service industry, now use a franchise system. This essentially places the risk on someone else. The main business licenses another, which bears risks, to use its logo, recipes, and materials, and only those. It also ties the franchisee into regular payments for these privileges.

The franchisee is then left to use the money left over to pay for staff and business costs, and keeps anything left over after bills and taxes. If the Franchisor then chooses to grant another franchise nearby, there is little that the franchisee can do; and nor can they offer their own independent products.

For all of this, even the biggest businesses can eventually reach a point where their costs are rising, or their revenues are falling. They can hold this moment off by innovation, advertising, and business strategy, and by more dubious methods such as restrictive practices (forcing franchisees to use only the business’ own engineers and charging them, as McDonalds was lately caught doing, when the machines McDonalds force franchisees to use go wrong, for instance.) The fate of most businesses is that of monopolistic, or imperfect competition, however.

Towards the end of their existence, businesses therefore can be found investing in external growth—buying other companies, or diversifying out of original markets. This may work as a strategy for some time (it has recently for Disney, for instance,) but it is still only really postponing the moment when the business will either have to retreat, break up, or leave a market,

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the existence of different wages a problem for societies, and if so, how can it be remedied?

  Adam Smith, and Karl Marx, both believed that labour value lies at the heart of all economic value. Commodities, goods, and services arise from the interaction of land, labour, and capital. Since Land is fixed until new land is cleared or built by workers, and since capital enhances labour and is invented by people, they both thought that the only people who added value in economic transactions were workers. This theory of labour value was qualified in the second half of the twentieth century by the elevation of entrepreneurialism as a factor of production. The enterprising businesspeople who took on risks, brought factors together, and who were rewarded with profit having been prepared to make losses, were elevated to a ‘fourth factor.’ This idea makes some sense, but also serves to undermine the idea that labour value on its own creates economic value. If labour has value, some argue that the value of time taken from a life to work should be viewed equally. This means t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inequality, Part One: the greatest market failure?

    Income inequality arises when different consumers have different incomes, and different people have different talents. It could also arise because of the source of income or the value of the talents. For instance, employees might have different incomes from each other because of different marginal labour products, different factor returns to their labour, or different elasticities of labour. People might have different skills for which there is a greater or lesser need and employers, or the purchasers of labour might have different demands. Equally, entrepreneurs often take greater risks than others, and thereby expect and receive greater rewards than those who do not take risks. There might be different factor returns to capital or land, which result in various levels of profit, dividend, or rent, for those who do not live by the return to their labour value. A functional market would bring all these diverse groups together as suppliers and consumers and would matc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Should economically less developed countries fix their exchange rates or let their currencies float freely?

  An exchange rate represents the value of one currency in terms of another. Central banks can attempt to ‘fix’ these rates by declaring a value at which the currency will be exchanged. They can then defend this rate against market speculation, should there be any, by manipulating interest rates, using currency controls, or buying and selling currency on the international markets. No one country can ‘hold out’ against the markets however, even if it is the biggest in the world, for very long, as exchange markets can mobilise more money than exists in any one country at any time. Therefore, countries which fix their rates either do so at a realistic level, and allow their currency to be traded, or use another currency internationally to that which is used domestically. In addition, some countries use a foreign currency for trade, and simply make any trade in their currency outside their own borders illegal. The reasons for which a country might choose to fix its exchange rate are ...
Post a Comment
Read more